.
Feedback

Birds in Mission Viejo Test Positive for West Nile Virus

Tests confirm that the virus is present in the area. Around the county, 45 residents have been infected with West Nile Virus this year.

County health officials are reporting that dead birds in Mission Viejo have tested positive for West Nile Virus, confirming the presence of the virus in the area.

There have been 45 human case of West Nile Virus in Orange County this year and warning residents to stay aware of the buzz.

According to a report from the Orange County Health Care Agency, a Newport Beach man in his 30s, a Laguna Niguel woman in her 50s and a Lake Forest man in his 80s each tested positive for West Nile Virus in September. This year across Orange County, there have been more than four times as many cases as all of last year. No deaths have been attributed to the virus so far this year.

"It is ramping up," Deanne Thompson, the agency's spokeswoman, told Patch. "But this year has not been high compared to when it peaked in 2008, and we had 79 total infections." 

Recent years have also been fairly low in terms of WNV human cases. Thompson said in 2011 there were 10 cases, followed by one case in 2010 and four cases in 2009. The last WNV fatalities were reported in 2008.

"We've had some very low years," Thompson added.

Along with the human cases, the Orange County Vector Control District  reports 109 OC birds have died from WNV this year in cities including Newport Beach, Fountain Valley, Laguna Beach, Los Alamitos, Seal Beach, Mission Viejo and San Juan Capistrano.

Jared Dever, district spokesman, says residents should always keep their guard up against WNV because it's a threat year-round.

"Our mild climate does allow mosquitoes that primarily breed in the summer months to continue breeding at a greatly reduced rate during the winter months," Dever explained. "To believe that there is an absence of risk would be a dangerous assumption."

Dever says most people who are infected with WNV do not show symptoms, but those who do get sick typically experience fever, headache, nausea, body aches, mild skin rash or swollen lymph nodes. Elderly people are most susceptible for WNV, and in rare cases, WNV will progress to encephalitis, or inflammation of the brain. One in 150 people will need to be hospitalized.

"The time between the mosquito bite and the onset of illness, known as the incubation period, ranges from 3-15 days in humans," Dever said. "There is no specific treatment for infection with WNV."

OCVCD treats all known mosquito breeding sites around the county, and routinely conducts ground and aerial surveillance to identify new sources.

But there are precautions that residents should take against WNV, according to the Orange County Health Care Agency.

  • Avoid being outdoors at dusk and dawn when mosquitoes are most active.
  • Avoid shady and wooded areas during daytime hours.
  • Wear light colored, long-sleeved shirts and long pants when outdoors.
  • Apply insect repellents that contain the active ingredient DEET, picaridin, oil of lemon eucalyptus or other EPA approved repellent to exposed skin or clothing. Always following the manufacturer's directions for use.
  • Maintain window and door screening to help keep mosquitoes out of buildings.
  • Empty water from mosquito breeding sites such as buckets, unused kiddie pools, old tires or similar sites where mosquitoes lay eggs.

More information on mosquito control is available on the Orange County Vector Control District’s web site at ocvcd.org. Find out more WNV prevention tips at ochealthinfo.com.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Mission Viejo Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Greg Raths announced for Congress
Shripathi Kamath June 19, 2013 at 10:51 am
"As a Republican, he will go head to head with our current incumbant [sic]" Wait, areRead More there no other contenders? John Webb on the Republican side might run, and then there was that Irvine mayor Sukhee Kang fella, who finished second. The more the merrier. The more diversity in the views, even better. I would like to hear from contenders how they would vote differently on some of the votes the incumbents have cast. Because all too often we have "an independent minded Republican" or a "progressive reformer" or "Heck, I am BATMAN himself" only to have disappointing regurgitation of ideology of what should not be done ("low taxes", "freedom", "family values", "apple pie, motherhood"). Not what will be done. And until we have that, corporate monies shall determine our representative. I mean I can imagine Mr. Raths voting for the 45th time to repeal Obamacare, but seriously, which vote that John Campbell cast would be different if Mr. Raths were in office? If 90% of the positions are the same, it looks like a remarkable coincidence that an independent thinker is so like the incumbent, does it not? Mr. Raths did offer an 'independent' idea endorsing civil unions but not gay marriage. Cool. Is he going to sponsor a bill for civil unions? Or simply insist on enforcing DOMA because "sanctity of marriage", "religious liberty". How about H.R. 1797? How about the Gang of 8 bill on immigration if it passes the Senate and comes to the House? Will his vote be different than that of Mr. Campbell's? That is the key question. But again, I welcome Mr. Raths entry in the field, we need more variety, and if we cannot get that, we at least need more people willing to run. Good luck to you, sir.
Human Options' Cristi Dugger
Peter Schelden (Editor) June 19, 2013 at 09:29 am
Uncanny timing—this is especially poignant in light of this announcement:Read More http://alisoviejo.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/elder-sexual-abuse-caregiver-suspect-arrested
M June 19, 2013 at 07:32 am
Anymore info on this place? When I looked online the only location is vista, ca
Dan Avery June 16, 2013 at 10:09 am
Tom Thumb you didn't read section 1021(b)(2) closely enough. It wouldn't apply to those arming theRead More rebels because of the word "suspicion." We know they are arming the rebels. See the difference. 1021(b)(2) only applies to those we "suspect" like you. Notice how the word "reasonable" doesn't appear anywhere near "suspicion"? Hmmmm wonder why that would be. Section 1021(b)(2) seems to be the modern day "suspicion of lurking with intent."
Tom Thumb June 16, 2013 at 02:31 pm
Shoot, I don't know about that. What we are hearing now is Obama/McCain are pushing to arm theRead More rebels who are supporting and are part of Al Qaeda: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22095099
Shripathi Kamath June 16, 2013 at 03:02 pm
Hey Avery, I am totally stealing the "suspicion of lurking with intent" phrase. It mightRead More even flourish on reddit.