.
Feedback

BLOG: The Top-Secret Formula for No. 1 Google Ranking

So you want to rank at the top of Google? Have I got the answer for you...

The one comment I hear routinely from prospective clients is, “I don’t care what you do, just make me No. 1 on Google.”

There are a few things driving that simple statement. One is that the person doesn’t know why they want a website; someone just told them they needed one, or several customers have asked where the website is on the net, or they are desperate for business and want to try this new web “thing.” Another is that they know being No. 1 on Google is a “good” thing, and they hope that it will improve their business.

Being No. 1 on Google’s listing is a good thing because your business’ name is very prominent. However it won’t transform your business. You may get more phone calls about your business, but more calls is rarely desirable. Which would you rather have: more calls or higher quality calls?

The Real Secret to Top Listings

Being at the very top of Google’s listing is insanely easy. Buy the ticket and take the ride. It’s a paid spot and a legitimate business expense. The first four spots are actually available for a fee as well as the ones at the top of the sidebar on the results page. If being at the top of Google is that important to you, then pay for it out of your advertising budget. Problem solved. We can all go home now.

And I see there are still some people left. The folks who want to do this for free. I didn’t think I’d get out of here that easily. Well, if you really want to know the real trade secret, I’ll share it with you. Read on.

Let’s consider what Google does so well and what Google is supposed to do. Lucky for us, they are the exact same thing. Google helps people find "stuff." All sorts of "stuff." Their main page has one of the most beautiful user interfaces in the world. It’s very zen, and it’s dead simple to use. A day doesn’t go by that I don’t use Google somewhere over 50 times, and every time I pause to marvel at the simplicity of the page.

Finding “stuff” on the web, however, is anything but simple, unless you want to settle for garbage. There’s a lot of garbage on the web actually, and it gets in the way of Google finding the quality stuff. So Google tinkers with its algorithm. In March of 2012 they made 50 changes to their search algorithm. Google expects to make more than 500 changes to their algorithm this year. This tinkering drives some people in the search engine optimization business batty, because they are trying to game the system. They’re part of the reason that the web has so much garbage.

There’s a Sucker Born Every Minute

SEO (search engine optimization) has become a huge business and, for some, an art. To be sure, there are legitimate people practicing SEO, but there are more Carpetbaggers in that field than legitimate folks. So, all you have to do is go find one of the Carpetbaggers, and you’ll be at the top of the search listings for a few months. Then you’ll fall off and have to pay your guy again for the “new secrets."

The Hidden and Ultra-Secret Way to Rank Higher

How does Rolls Royce turn out a high quality product year after year after year? Did you know you can stand next to a 50-year-old Rolls Royce that’s running and the engine is quiet and doesn’t vibrate? It’s remarkable.

The garbage clogging the web is as serious a problem as the Chevrolet Corvair, deemed “unsafe at any speed.” So what did Google do lately to improve your search results? The partial list of changes below are from March 2012.

  • Pages with ads above the fold will be penalized because people don’t want to scroll past a bunch of ads to get to the content they searched for. One or two ads are not a big deal. Loading up the page at the top with ads simply to monitize your blog will lower your Google ranking.
  • Freshness is now measured more effectively. “Freshness” has to do with the age of a page. Businesses that put up a few pages and then never change them will see themselves penalized for it.
  • Relevance of content — Is the content relevant to the keywords in the document head, relevant to the description in the head and relevant to the headings used in the page? Here, care needs to be taken in sites powered by programs like WordPress because the keywords and the description tend to be set globally and won’t apply to each individual page.
  • Site Quality — sites that contain quality content that is relevant and timely will rank higher. It means your content is concise, grammatically correct, spelled properly, and well-written. Notice how I separated “well-written” from “grammatically correct” and from “spelled properly?” It’s an important distinction.
  • Page Layout — Semantic layouts are rewarded, while non-semantic layouts are penalized. If your designer used tables to layout the pages, you do not have a semantic layout. It’s really that cut and dried.
  • Classification of images has been enhanced. All images have “alt” and “title” tags and a good designer uses them religiously to help people with accessibility issues. We do that because it is the right thing to do. Google uses those tags to help categorize the site’s images and to help measure quality and relevance. If your designer didn’t care about people who can’t use a mouse or need a screen reader, figuring they weren’t important, your site will be penalized. Filler images will lower your score. A table-based layout depends on filler images.

The Top-Secret, Fool-Proof Way to Google Success

Avoid fads, Daddy-o. Think long-term. The days of improving your ranking by buying keywords are long gone. Put your efforts into creating high-quality content that actually makes a difference for your visitors. Content that actually provides value to them. And if you have to tell them you’re providing value…you aren’t.

Matt Curtis, head of Google’s spam team, calls the changes, “leveling the playing field.” All search engines are going to crack down with a vengeance on poorly written, irrelevant content this year. Instead of paying a designer to play games in the code, start offering well-written, timely, and unique content consistently. If you can’t write, hire someone who can.

Matt Malone over at Gravitate has come up with five simple questions to gauge your site.

  1. Do you have an attractive site?
  2. Is your site easy to navigate?
  3. Is each page on your site specific to only one or two topics?
  4. Is your copy grammatically correct, completely original and at least 250 words per page?
  5. Do you have a blog hosted on your domain that you update at least twice a month?

To his five questions I would add a couple of things. Your site needs to be attractive on all modern devices. Pay your designer to make your site responsive, rather than making it look good in Internet Explorer 6 and 7. Never pay a designer to make you a mobile site. People hate mobile sites.

Layout is the other important focus point. How is your site laid out? If it’s a table-based design you need to start thinking about spending the money it’s going to take to change it to a semantic layout. The search engines are not going to reverse their stance of penalizing table-based sites, because, quite simply, we haven’t needed to use tables for design purposes since 1998.

Dan Krolczyk April 30, 2012 at 12:40 pm
Good points, Dan.
Roger E. Bütow May 1, 2012 at 02:20 pm
"Buy the ticket and take the ride" was one of Hunter S. (Gonzo) Thompson's favorite sayings. Loved the context you used regarding it.
When I formed CLEAN WATER NOW! almost 15 years ago it took me a few years to realize securing the web domain name would help announce it to the world and keep web connectivity for media, members and beach cleanup volunteers. I had to drop the emphatic exclamation mark because the internet doesn't allow that. Today, if you Google, Yahoo or Bing, the CWN site and just about anything remotely resembling those 3 words comes up near the top. We're easy to find, people don't like going past the 1st page or 2 on any of the search engines anyway. I'd be curious about your take re SEO for individual media columns, blogs, articles, etc.? My own personal writing got a bigger web presence bump when I started including aspects of SEO in my posting titles and first few paragraphs. Once I researched, got the hang of spiders and keywords, my writing actually improved as i could hone in on my target audiences, regardless of the subject. No second chance to make a first impression :+) :+) Now I give my stuff a tentative title, search the web, and if necessary change it preemptively to assure greater dispersion and presence---Sometimes this becomes indefinite and prolonged, I get emails about columns I wrote 3-4 years ago! PS: Thanks for blogging....watch out for those trolls I wrote about here in LB Patch recently.
Dan Avery May 1, 2012 at 02:35 pm
Thanks Dan and Roger.
Roger, using SEO tactics in your writing will do what you say for sure. It's one way to hone your writing too. And it's probably the best approach to marketing. I could be better about it myself. I tend to write what's on my mind and let the chips fall where they may. I guess that comes from starting out writing poetry and fiction. I think the real key is to have quality writing. If your writing is direct, grammatical, and clear, it will be easier for the search engines to categorize. What is your URL? I'd love to visit your site. Links are okay in most comments as long as you only use one or two. And links to your site still help in the google ranking. One great thing you have going for you is the longevity of your site. I'm told that helps quite a bit. And it makes sense the search engines would reward sites that are stable. Plus it sounds like you add to your site quite a bit. That is crucial. I believe Google is committed to making content king. And to standards compliance.
Roger E. Bütow May 1, 2012 at 05:16 pm
DA:
Forgot to mention that I also purchased the domains ending in .INFO & .US to secure future potential. I revamped my original site (www.cleanwaternow.com) significantly a few years ago to streamline it, also started putting more emphasis on our volunteers efforts via contextual photos. So I opened a PICASA photo album account, transfer medium quality 400 KB JPEGS (they only accept the JPEG format) of not only photos but group announcements/information (if in PDF I re-format), creating an online message board that's updated as necessary. People like browsing the photos, I give them captions to augment and identify participants. Unfortunately, the unneeded Google email account I had to open for PICASA gets a lot of spam. I check the Gmail every 3-4 days and delete 'em all! I started local emphasis/oriented writing @ Laguna Beach Patch a few months ago because (a) Huffington Media gets high web saturation and (b) Editor Rich Kane bought me lunch at La Sirena and begged me to contribute :+) My main media squeeze is Salem-News.com, they're in the top 5% of online magazine traffic, and though out of Oregon have national and international correspondents. So placement at a highly trafficked nexus like S-N.com has helped---It was one of their editors who pointed out SEO to me. Funny thing is, most of their writers don't use SEO principles, go figure?
Penny Arévalo (Editor) May 1, 2012 at 06:39 pm
I'm not sure it hones your writing. When I was doing SEO writing for other websites, I had to incorporate misspelled words and words that weren't actually words just because people would put them into a search engine. I find that awkward!
Roger E. Bütow May 1, 2012 at 08:23 pm
Penny:
My editor @ www.salem-news.com (Tim King) told me today that he mistakenly spelled Steve Irwin's (Croc Hunter) name wrong upon his weird death by stingray, the website got tons of hits and constant blog corrections...So if the only goal is just sheer volume of traffic, intentional or not, using colloquialisms, slang, misspelled words, etc. then mission accomplished! Browsers go to it by mistake or confusion, but stick around and MAYBE increase advertising coffers. Writers, whether the general public realize it can be perfectionists, their thoughts are their products, so I empathize with you as the pro you must be. I forgot to mention that a second advantage of a Google email account (not sure about the other major 2) has marketing/networking value-add, at least in my case. It lets me post a free blog to post my CV (resumé) and employment history, so I can reach potential employers. There are even background templates/wallpaper to help you create a semi-unique atmosphere. Naturally, I chose a beautiful beach sunset: http://rogerbutow.blogspot.com/ I'd like to see Dan toss out more of his thoughts on these sidebars, maybe worthy of a future column?.
Penny Arévalo (Editor) May 1, 2012 at 08:27 pm
Absolutely, if you measure it by unique viewers, yes! But "hones your writing?" No! It pained me to have to incorporate a non-word into the first sentence of a story. And a lot of the times, it can be very awkward to work exact phrasing of key words into a sentence (although creative punctuation helps). At that point, it becomes a game, I guess.
Roger E. Bütow May 1, 2012 at 08:44 pm
Penny:
Lo siento (sorry), I didn't realize that you are the SJC Patch editor, I just used Google and discovered the connection. I grew up in a barrio, the mean streets of Wilmas (Wilmington---LA Harbor), and so we're apparently native So Cal bloggers who are blogging on other's blogs, who'd a thunk it? :+) I'm blonde (ok, I WAS blonde), esculpa-me (excuse me) and I get confused easily, should have looked your web presence up first. I think part of the dialogue here is in Dan's tutorial: Quality content usually trumps quantitative number of hits. Harsh metaphor, but as a Marine I was told that's the sniper code, one shot one kill. Thanks for stepping up in SJC---Your CV rocks, I'm glad that this PATCH family as a healthy mainstream alternative, and as a boots on the ground community resource appears to be spreading its wings and growing. Locally responsive AND responsible.
Dan Avery May 1, 2012 at 09:35 pm
Exactly, Penny, and that's what Google is trying to cut short: the game. Or "black hat" SEO it's called. I prefer the term "carpetbagger" because it's more precise. Short term gains are easily accomplished by a few tricks, but if you think long-term they will only harm your business. We're still in the early days of the web after all. But things are progressing more and more quickly each year as far as weeding out the garbage for the quality.
Dan Avery May 1, 2012 at 09:41 pm
Roger, I don't think most writers know about SEO principles. Plus SEO, as my article suggests, is shifting sand. Quality writing has always been quality writing. One topic per article. Use of topic sentences and focused paragraphs. It's what we should learn in the fifth grade, but don't. When I left UCI as a Lecturer, I was teaching how to write an analytical thesis and how to use topic sentences in the final section of freshman composition. My students would come in frustrated and say "just tell me what you want to hear so I can get an A and go on to medical school." Scary, eh? This notion of someone who wants to be a doctor but doesn't seen the need to learn how to craft an analytical thesis.
Anyway, I really don't think writers need to know anything about SEO. They should know how to dance with the language. Do that and you'll show up on Google.
Penny Arévalo (Editor) May 1, 2012 at 10:15 pm
Gracias, y no necesita transducir su español.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Mission Viejo Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Greg Raths announced for Congress
Shripathi Kamath June 19, 2013 at 10:51 am
"As a Republican, he will go head to head with our current incumbant [sic]" Wait, areRead More there no other contenders? John Webb on the Republican side might run, and then there was that Irvine mayor Sukhee Kang fella, who finished second. The more the merrier. The more diversity in the views, even better. I would like to hear from contenders how they would vote differently on some of the votes the incumbents have cast. Because all too often we have "an independent minded Republican" or a "progressive reformer" or "Heck, I am BATMAN himself" only to have disappointing regurgitation of ideology of what should not be done ("low taxes", "freedom", "family values", "apple pie, motherhood"). Not what will be done. And until we have that, corporate monies shall determine our representative. I mean I can imagine Mr. Raths voting for the 45th time to repeal Obamacare, but seriously, which vote that John Campbell cast would be different if Mr. Raths were in office? If 90% of the positions are the same, it looks like a remarkable coincidence that an independent thinker is so like the incumbent, does it not? Mr. Raths did offer an 'independent' idea endorsing civil unions but not gay marriage. Cool. Is he going to sponsor a bill for civil unions? Or simply insist on enforcing DOMA because "sanctity of marriage", "religious liberty". How about H.R. 1797? How about the Gang of 8 bill on immigration if it passes the Senate and comes to the House? Will his vote be different than that of Mr. Campbell's? That is the key question. But again, I welcome Mr. Raths entry in the field, we need more variety, and if we cannot get that, we at least need more people willing to run. Good luck to you, sir.
Gregory Raths June 19, 2013 at 05:30 pm
I've talked with both John Webb & Sukhee Kang and they have indicated they will not be runningRead More in 2014. I do welcome all entries into the 2014 race. GREG RATHS
Human Options' Cristi Dugger
Peter Schelden (Editor) June 19, 2013 at 09:29 am
Uncanny timing—this is especially poignant in light of this announcement:Read More http://alisoviejo.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/elder-sexual-abuse-caregiver-suspect-arrested
M June 19, 2013 at 07:32 am
Anymore info on this place? When I looked online the only location is vista, ca
Dan Avery June 16, 2013 at 10:09 am
Tom Thumb you didn't read section 1021(b)(2) closely enough. It wouldn't apply to those arming theRead More rebels because of the word "suspicion." We know they are arming the rebels. See the difference. 1021(b)(2) only applies to those we "suspect" like you. Notice how the word "reasonable" doesn't appear anywhere near "suspicion"? Hmmmm wonder why that would be. Section 1021(b)(2) seems to be the modern day "suspicion of lurking with intent."
Tom Thumb June 16, 2013 at 02:31 pm
Shoot, I don't know about that. What we are hearing now is Obama/McCain are pushing to arm theRead More rebels who are supporting and are part of Al Qaeda: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22095099
Shripathi Kamath June 16, 2013 at 03:02 pm
Hey Avery, I am totally stealing the "suspicion of lurking with intent" phrase. It mightRead More even flourish on reddit.