.
Feedback

My Thoughts About Capo Valley High, Volume 1

Teen's thoughts on Capo, first volume. Involves clubs, schoolwork, and class hierarchies.

It's really a rather nice school, Capo Valley High. It has what I want, but I found out fairly quickly I need to take action to get that.

I'm part of the ATMS (Academy of Technology Math Science) program, which, to fill in, is like the GATE program in elementary/middle school, focusing on accelerated math, science, and English classes. I'm not going to lie, they're hard classes. However, it has that kind of mental stimulation I need. I can't just sit in a course and coast through. I just get frustrated and annoyed by the lack of interest in it.

I'm vice president of the Capo Robotics Club, and with the help of my friend (who shall just be named V) we started the once-dead club up again, and it's got a very supportive base. It's not the largest interest group in the school, but I'm really happy with the enthusiasm everyone has about building our first robot.

Some of the school is rather annoying though. My main complaint is that it's very hierarchal in some aspects. The administration is attempting to break this down a little bit (mostly to the outrage of the seniors, as shown in every copy of the CVHS Times) and it's getting better, but I find it very counter-productive to have a system like that at all. If everyone is there for an education, great, we're all peers, right? With a hierarchy, it (sometimes unintentionally) creates bad feelings between inferior groups towards the higher-placed ones. I've noticed this isn't really a problem at Capo, but it is at some other schools, and I find it ridiculous.

Anyways, that's it for me delaying any more work to get done before school starts up again.

Christopher M. January 11, 2013 at 04:21 am
I'm more indifferent about CAPO. I don't really have a lot of pluses for it, more negative (like the lay out). I like some of the teachers I have as classes and a little more freedom at lunch time. But I don't really like the layout of the school.
A really kind of out there idea I've thought of before is if CAPO (perhaps even CUSD) had some sort of democracy or voting system (Ex: some of the major rules that are made, but that would have it's own issues.
Peter Schelden (Editor) January 11, 2013 at 01:59 pm
What sort of rules do you want to vote on, Christopher?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Mission Viejo Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Greg Raths announced for Congress
Shripathi Kamath June 19, 2013 at 10:51 am
"As a Republican, he will go head to head with our current incumbant [sic]" Wait, areRead More there no other contenders? John Webb on the Republican side might run, and then there was that Irvine mayor Sukhee Kang fella, who finished second. The more the merrier. The more diversity in the views, even better. I would like to hear from contenders how they would vote differently on some of the votes the incumbents have cast. Because all too often we have "an independent minded Republican" or a "progressive reformer" or "Heck, I am BATMAN himself" only to have disappointing regurgitation of ideology of what should not be done ("low taxes", "freedom", "family values", "apple pie, motherhood"). Not what will be done. And until we have that, corporate monies shall determine our representative. I mean I can imagine Mr. Raths voting for the 45th time to repeal Obamacare, but seriously, which vote that John Campbell cast would be different if Mr. Raths were in office? If 90% of the positions are the same, it looks like a remarkable coincidence that an independent thinker is so like the incumbent, does it not? Mr. Raths did offer an 'independent' idea endorsing civil unions but not gay marriage. Cool. Is he going to sponsor a bill for civil unions? Or simply insist on enforcing DOMA because "sanctity of marriage", "religious liberty". How about H.R. 1797? How about the Gang of 8 bill on immigration if it passes the Senate and comes to the House? Will his vote be different than that of Mr. Campbell's? That is the key question. But again, I welcome Mr. Raths entry in the field, we need more variety, and if we cannot get that, we at least need more people willing to run. Good luck to you, sir.
Gregory Raths June 19, 2013 at 05:30 pm
I've talked with both John Webb & Sukhee Kang and they have indicated they will not be runningRead More in 2014. I do welcome all entries into the 2014 race. GREG RATHS
Human Options' Cristi Dugger
Peter Schelden (Editor) June 19, 2013 at 09:29 am
Uncanny timing—this is especially poignant in light of this announcement:Read More http://alisoviejo.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/elder-sexual-abuse-caregiver-suspect-arrested
M June 19, 2013 at 07:32 am
Anymore info on this place? When I looked online the only location is vista, ca
Dan Avery June 16, 2013 at 10:09 am
Tom Thumb you didn't read section 1021(b)(2) closely enough. It wouldn't apply to those arming theRead More rebels because of the word "suspicion." We know they are arming the rebels. See the difference. 1021(b)(2) only applies to those we "suspect" like you. Notice how the word "reasonable" doesn't appear anywhere near "suspicion"? Hmmmm wonder why that would be. Section 1021(b)(2) seems to be the modern day "suspicion of lurking with intent."
Tom Thumb June 16, 2013 at 02:31 pm
Shoot, I don't know about that. What we are hearing now is Obama/McCain are pushing to arm theRead More rebels who are supporting and are part of Al Qaeda: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22095099
Shripathi Kamath June 16, 2013 at 03:02 pm
Hey Avery, I am totally stealing the "suspicion of lurking with intent" phrase. It mightRead More even flourish on reddit.