.
Feedback

Captain America: Good or Evil?

Burglethorpe and Joe return with two very different takes on this summer blockbuster.

Our Caviar and Popcorn series returns with this week's movie, Captain America.

See below to read what our two resident film critics think about this latest Marvel remake of a comic book legend.

You may not agree with our critics, but they're never boring.

Burglethorpe:

It may shock some of you to know that I spent quite a few hours in dusty comic book bins when I was a kid--before I discovered literature.

I followed Frank Miller’s Batman religiously, and I was at ground zero when Neil Gaiman began his epic Sandman series.

So, it is not on principle that I yawned my way through Captain America, fighting narcolepsy, and the strong urge to snore.

It was entirely the fault of the movie, which unfortunately mistakes repetitive haymakers and amateurish fight choreography for Captain America’s straightforward idealism.

Yes, Steve Rogers is the imago of the most substantive and admirable parts of the American character; yes, he uses the shield to protect freedom, not prosecute it overseas in costly wars of opportunism fueled by stupidity, and nurtured by American ignorance.

Yes, Captain America couldn’t catch a good time on New Year's Eve at the Las Vegas Strip.

Steve Rogers in the role of Captain America is the best of us, but does the best of us have to be so... damned... boring?

The villain (played by the always adept Hugo Weaving) is fun to watch; he’s also fun to listen to, although he seems to have learned his German accent by rehearsing Warner Herzog monologues.

You’re probably going to see the movie anyway, but do yourself a favor and save it for the next time a six-pack of beer and a little late-night reading doesn’t put you to sleep.

This movie will do the trick.

Caviar Rating: 2

 

Joe:

You know, there was a time when men were men, and women were women. And people looked up to heroes.

We all know it, too.

America didn’t feel guilty about being the best. It felt responsible.

It led the world. Captain America is about that America, the one that liberated Europe and rebuilt Japan.

Once again, Marvel has done a great job of bringing a comic book superhero to the silver screen.

The story is a simple one, and is a great way to help you remember why America leads the rest of the world.

Because “quit” wasn’t in the national vocabulary.

Captain America, against incredible odds, defeats the German menace The Red Skull, who is bent on ruling the world.

And he does it with plenty of snappy action sequences and a brunette bombshell. Hayley Atwell fills out a red dress better than anyone since Scarlett Johansson.

The movie’s not all explosions and hot co-stars. There’s a better than average story here too.

We make some real emotional connections to the characters in this movie, which makes it tough when some of them die.

No spoilers on who, though.

Also, make sure to stick around after the credits. There’s an easter egg scene from the upcoming Avengers movie.

Popcorn Rating: 4 

 

 

 

Kerry July 24, 2011 at 02:24 pm
" Captain America couldn’t catch a good time on New Year's Eve at the Las Vegas Strip" Haha, that's pretty uptight!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Mission Viejo Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Greg Raths announced for Congress
Shripathi Kamath June 19, 2013 at 10:51 am
"As a Republican, he will go head to head with our current incumbant [sic]" Wait, areRead More there no other contenders? John Webb on the Republican side might run, and then there was that Irvine mayor Sukhee Kang fella, who finished second. The more the merrier. The more diversity in the views, even better. I would like to hear from contenders how they would vote differently on some of the votes the incumbents have cast. Because all too often we have "an independent minded Republican" or a "progressive reformer" or "Heck, I am BATMAN himself" only to have disappointing regurgitation of ideology of what should not be done ("low taxes", "freedom", "family values", "apple pie, motherhood"). Not what will be done. And until we have that, corporate monies shall determine our representative. I mean I can imagine Mr. Raths voting for the 45th time to repeal Obamacare, but seriously, which vote that John Campbell cast would be different if Mr. Raths were in office? If 90% of the positions are the same, it looks like a remarkable coincidence that an independent thinker is so like the incumbent, does it not? Mr. Raths did offer an 'independent' idea endorsing civil unions but not gay marriage. Cool. Is he going to sponsor a bill for civil unions? Or simply insist on enforcing DOMA because "sanctity of marriage", "religious liberty". How about H.R. 1797? How about the Gang of 8 bill on immigration if it passes the Senate and comes to the House? Will his vote be different than that of Mr. Campbell's? That is the key question. But again, I welcome Mr. Raths entry in the field, we need more variety, and if we cannot get that, we at least need more people willing to run. Good luck to you, sir.
Human Options' Cristi Dugger
Peter Schelden (Editor) June 19, 2013 at 09:29 am
Uncanny timing—this is especially poignant in light of this announcement:Read More http://alisoviejo.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/elder-sexual-abuse-caregiver-suspect-arrested
M June 19, 2013 at 07:32 am
Anymore info on this place? When I looked online the only location is vista, ca
Dan Avery June 16, 2013 at 10:09 am
Tom Thumb you didn't read section 1021(b)(2) closely enough. It wouldn't apply to those arming theRead More rebels because of the word "suspicion." We know they are arming the rebels. See the difference. 1021(b)(2) only applies to those we "suspect" like you. Notice how the word "reasonable" doesn't appear anywhere near "suspicion"? Hmmmm wonder why that would be. Section 1021(b)(2) seems to be the modern day "suspicion of lurking with intent."
Tom Thumb June 16, 2013 at 02:31 pm
Shoot, I don't know about that. What we are hearing now is Obama/McCain are pushing to arm theRead More rebels who are supporting and are part of Al Qaeda: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22095099
Shripathi Kamath June 16, 2013 at 03:02 pm
Hey Avery, I am totally stealing the "suspicion of lurking with intent" phrase. It mightRead More even flourish on reddit.