.
Feedback

Cowboys and Aliens--Can't Miss or Miss?

Should you spend your money on this genre-bending film?

Burglethorpe:

Next time I see a movie, I’m going to demand that Patch allow me to choose.

Sincerely, do any of you really choose to go to these movies of your own free will, or are you just conscripted by the giant piles of cash advertisers press upon you?

What movie am I talking about? Does it really matter?

Ho-hum, well, since they do pay me to write something about what I’ve seen, I might as well break it to you: Cowboys and Aliens.

The Aliens in this particular cinematic regurgitation are a ridiculous cross between a Lord of the Rings Cave Troll and that little parasitic chest-baby Kuato from Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Total Recall.

And the Cowboys? The cowboys aren’t really cowboys at all, just working class schmoes kicked around by their capitalist lords.

Seriously, this movie is like a commercial for an Ayn Rand-styled America.

Let me draw you a picture. Harrison Ford is the wealthy cattle magnate who complains that the townsfolk are ungrateful for the jobs he provides them, and the movie tacitly endorses this opinion. He also has a partially adopted non-white son (can you say Indian Reservations?) who he teaches to be a man.

He also teaches all of the Apache in this film what a great leader he is, and how he is worthy of their veneration.

Basically, Harrison Ford is the personification of the White Man’s Burden--with a 5 o’clock shadow.

In movies like this, it’s guaranteed that the big celebration at the end will include several American flags on display as the protagonists celebrate their victory. And Cowboys and Aliens does not disappoint. 

If in doubt, please see: Armageddon, Independence Day, Superman, The Day After Tomorrow, Forest Gump...

There are lots of explosions, and plenty of loud noises if you’re into demolition projects masquerading as films.

But please, save yourself some time: buy a flag; kick a minority, and give the nearest vagrant a copy of Atlas Shrugged.

It’s about the same thing.

Caviar Rating: 0

 

Joe:

I wanted to like Cowboys and Aliens more than I did.

Daniel Craig of James Bond fame is a personal favorite. Harrison Ford is a legend. And Olivia Wilde is about as hot as they come.

Throw in Iron Man’s Jon Favreau behind the camera and it’s hard to see how the movie could miss.

But it did.

Don’t get me wrong--it didn’t miss by much. There’s a lot of great action in this movie, and the scenes with Craig and Ford are better than good. Harrison Ford has more gravity than a black hole. That guy could pull off just about any role.

All of the individual elements were there: plot, suspense, character motivation. But it felt almost like there was a checklist when they were making the movie.

The opening 10 minutes of the movie are flawless--the fight sequence rocks. Our introduction to Craig’s character sets him up as one of the great action-film mystery men.

But after that the film doesn’t quite hum.

Olivia Wilde was easy to look at, and so was Abigail Spencer--her flashback look-alike--but there wasn’t enough sexual tension between Wilde and Craig. That’s fine, of course, but if you’re going to cast Olivia Wilde in a movie it’s a waste to go without it.

The plot was well executed, and the final showdown between the Aliens and the Cowboys was a lot of fun.

It reminded me a bit of the showdown between the Ewoks and the Stormtroopers in Return of the Jedi, except the special effects were much better this time around.

If you’re in the mood for a good action flick, I certainly wouldn’t miss this one, but in a summer with some great action movies--, , Transformers--it doesn’t shine quite as bright.

Popcorn Rating: 3 1/2

 

Kerry August 9, 2011 at 01:41 pm
Sounds like a lot of fun and that might be all I can hope for in a movie anymore. I cant remember when Ive been moved by one. Does anyone have a recommendation on the current offerings?
Julie Flores August 9, 2011 at 01:47 pm
I went with my 12-year-old son and he loved all the action. I fell in love with Daniel Craig, so it was win-win.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Mission Viejo Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Greg Raths announced for Congress
Shripathi Kamath June 19, 2013 at 10:51 am
"As a Republican, he will go head to head with our current incumbant [sic]" Wait, areRead More there no other contenders? John Webb on the Republican side might run, and then there was that Irvine mayor Sukhee Kang fella, who finished second. The more the merrier. The more diversity in the views, even better. I would like to hear from contenders how they would vote differently on some of the votes the incumbents have cast. Because all too often we have "an independent minded Republican" or a "progressive reformer" or "Heck, I am BATMAN himself" only to have disappointing regurgitation of ideology of what should not be done ("low taxes", "freedom", "family values", "apple pie, motherhood"). Not what will be done. And until we have that, corporate monies shall determine our representative. I mean I can imagine Mr. Raths voting for the 45th time to repeal Obamacare, but seriously, which vote that John Campbell cast would be different if Mr. Raths were in office? If 90% of the positions are the same, it looks like a remarkable coincidence that an independent thinker is so like the incumbent, does it not? Mr. Raths did offer an 'independent' idea endorsing civil unions but not gay marriage. Cool. Is he going to sponsor a bill for civil unions? Or simply insist on enforcing DOMA because "sanctity of marriage", "religious liberty". How about H.R. 1797? How about the Gang of 8 bill on immigration if it passes the Senate and comes to the House? Will his vote be different than that of Mr. Campbell's? That is the key question. But again, I welcome Mr. Raths entry in the field, we need more variety, and if we cannot get that, we at least need more people willing to run. Good luck to you, sir.
Gregory Raths June 19, 2013 at 05:30 pm
I've talked with both John Webb & Sukhee Kang and they have indicated they will not be runningRead More in 2014. I do welcome all entries into the 2014 race. GREG RATHS
Human Options' Cristi Dugger
Peter Schelden (Editor) June 19, 2013 at 09:29 am
Uncanny timing—this is especially poignant in light of this announcement:Read More http://alisoviejo.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/elder-sexual-abuse-caregiver-suspect-arrested
M June 19, 2013 at 07:32 am
Anymore info on this place? When I looked online the only location is vista, ca
Dan Avery June 16, 2013 at 10:09 am
Tom Thumb you didn't read section 1021(b)(2) closely enough. It wouldn't apply to those arming theRead More rebels because of the word "suspicion." We know they are arming the rebels. See the difference. 1021(b)(2) only applies to those we "suspect" like you. Notice how the word "reasonable" doesn't appear anywhere near "suspicion"? Hmmmm wonder why that would be. Section 1021(b)(2) seems to be the modern day "suspicion of lurking with intent."
Tom Thumb June 16, 2013 at 02:31 pm
Shoot, I don't know about that. What we are hearing now is Obama/McCain are pushing to arm theRead More rebels who are supporting and are part of Al Qaeda: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22095099
Shripathi Kamath June 16, 2013 at 03:02 pm
Hey Avery, I am totally stealing the "suspicion of lurking with intent" phrase. It mightRead More even flourish on reddit.