.
Feedback

Trial of Alleged New Year's Murderer Delayed

Adam Randy Baker, of Dana Point, is accused of stabbing two Mission Viejo men—one fatally—during a New Year's Eve party.

The trial of Dana Point man Adam Randy Baker, accused of fatally stabbing Mission Viejo Air Force veteran Robert Sickles at a 2011 New Year's Eve party, was pushed back by approximately a month Monday.

Orange County Superior Judge F.P. Briseno granted the delay at the request of Baker's attorney, Gary M. Pohlson. The trial is now scheduled to begin Nov. 5.

Baker is accused of stabbing two Mission Viejo men in a . Sickles, 27, was fatally wounded in the chest; Brian McTeigue, then 26, was stabbed in the back but survived.

According to Costa Mesa police, the crowd piling out from the New Year's Eve party surrounded Baker, beating and holding him down until police broke up the mob.

Baker, who is out of jail on $1 million bail, made his first court appearance since May at the Monday hearing.

He faces six felony charges, including murder, attempted murder and assault with a deadly weapon. According to court documents, Baker pled not guilty to the charges at an arraignment in April 2011.

Wendy Bucknum October 1, 2012 at 06:42 pm
This coward is delaying the resolution to this tragedy for the Sickles family. Many of us in Mission Viejo know and love this family and would like to see justice served on this criminal who is roaming free!
Art Art November 26, 2012 at 01:09 am
He is presumed innocent until proven guilty you bigot!
Beth Bailey December 1, 2012 at 03:58 am
What the heck does bigotry have to do with this scenario?
Barry January 3, 2013 at 09:38 pm
I know Adam he's a decent young man and deserves a fare trial, he was convicted on circumstantial evidence, and nothing more. The real killer is still out there. You know who you are. I pray that the Sickel family can find forgiveness in their hearts and real killer can be found.
Dean February 7, 2013 at 01:30 am
I know Adam , I would bet my last $ that these guys provoked him and he acted in self defense. Unfortunately the brothers got more than they bargained for. A tragedy none the less.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Mission Viejo Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Dan Avery June 16, 2013 at 10:09 am
Tom Thumb you didn't read section 1021(b)(2) closely enough. It wouldn't apply to those arming theRead More rebels because of the word "suspicion." We know they are arming the rebels. See the difference. 1021(b)(2) only applies to those we "suspect" like you. Notice how the word "reasonable" doesn't appear anywhere near "suspicion"? Hmmmm wonder why that would be. Section 1021(b)(2) seems to be the modern day "suspicion of lurking with intent."
Tom Thumb June 16, 2013 at 02:31 pm
Shoot, I don't know about that. What we are hearing now is Obama/McCain are pushing to arm theRead More rebels who are supporting and are part of Al Qaeda: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22095099
Shripathi Kamath June 16, 2013 at 03:02 pm
Hey Avery, I am totally stealing the "suspicion of lurking with intent" phrase. It mightRead More even flourish on reddit.
You're welcome!
Panglonymous June 6, 2013 at 07:35 pm
Graphs like this are sometimes created (and/or distributed) by persons with a deep understandingRead More (and/or appreciation) of things like this: 3. Something uncommon or unusual. 4. ~Astrophysics~ A point in space-time at which gravitational forces cause matter to have infinite density and infinitesimal volume, and space and time to become infinitely distorted. 5. ~Mathematics~ A point at which the derivative does not exist for a given function but every neighborhood of which contains points for which the derivative exists. Also called singular point.
Shripathi Kamath June 7, 2013 at 11:28 am
Don't toy with me, what happened to 1. and 2.? Is this some sort of Star Wars Jedi mind trickery onRead More sequence?