.
Feedback

City Balks at Electronic Sign Request

Kaleidoscope wanted big electronic signs overlooking the freeway, but the City Council indicated they would not support the idea.

Large electronic signs affixed to the walls of the and LED display ads received criticism from the city council Monday night. The council asked staff to look for ways to beautify the center without creating a special sign district.

Staff will also draw up plans with the possible sign district included, per a motion made by Councilmember .

The Kaleidoscope's representatives asked the council to consider a new sign district over the former community redevelopment area.

Several members of the public rejected the idea of large electronic signs, three of which would be visible from the I-5.

“We don’t need this kind of signage to pollute and clutter our city," Mission Viejo resident Dale Tyler said. "Mission Viejo must not become another Commerce.”

Jim Leach, CEO of the , saw the proposed signs differently. He called the Kaleidoscope sign project "a forward-looking project that will further enhance a significant property in the city… and give the city one more asset to be proud of."

Kelley said the council will reject large digital signs.

"We’re not going to go for all kinds of digital signage, but maybe there are things we can do to help your center, to help to beautify the project,” she said.

Colby Durnin, representing the Kaleidoscope, said the center's new building plan would remove some of the static signs currently standing in favor of the new electronic signs.

The big improvements are necessary because the center "has had trouble over the years attracting tenants and shoppers," said Reed Royalty, president of the Orange County Taxpayers Association.

Councilmember said she was concerned the city would lose control of the signs once they were built. She said creating a new sign district would be "harmful to those businesses outside of the district—it’s not a level playing field.”

Mayor said the city council was not interested in the current proposal.

Councilmember said he's received a lot of concerned emails from the public regarding the sign proposal.

"I haven’t seen the kinds of emails that are against this project in a long time," he said. "These aren’t just boilerplate emails. These are residents saying, ‘Whoa, let’s look at this.”

Leckness said Mission Viejo was the first city to reject Kentucky Fried Chicken's rotating bucket of chicken ad display and the first to reject the McDonald's golden arches display.

"We have a history as a city with tight rules,” he said.

The motion to ask city staff to return to the council with alternative proposals passed 3-2, with Councilmembers and Schlicht dissenting.

LAMAR KELSOE July 15, 2012 at 04:11 pm
PUTTING MORE LARGE SIGNS ON THE KALEIDOSCOPE IS LIKE TRYING TO CURE CANCER WITH A BAND AID. AS SOMEONE WHO HAS BEEN IN THE RETAIL BUSINESS FOR MOST OF MY LIFE, I CAN TELL YOU FROM PAST EXPERIENCE THAT THAT LOCATION WAS A POOR LOCATION FOR A RETAIL OPERATION. LOTS OF REASONS AND ONE IS NOT ENOUGH PARKING PLACES. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER SUITED FOR AN OFFICE COMPLEX. MY EXPERIENCE TELLS ME THAT LOCATION WILL NEVER BE A SUCCESSFUL RETAIL CENTER NO MATTER HOW MANY SIGNS YOU PUT UP. THE BEST WAY TO FIX THE PROBLEM IS TO REMODEL IT AND MAKE IT AN OFFICE BUILDING.
LAMAR KELSOE July 15, 2012 at 04:12 pm
SEE THE ABOVE STATEMENT

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Mission Viejo Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Greg Raths announced for Congress
Shripathi Kamath June 19, 2013 at 10:51 am
"As a Republican, he will go head to head with our current incumbant [sic]" Wait, areRead More there no other contenders? John Webb on the Republican side might run, and then there was that Irvine mayor Sukhee Kang fella, who finished second. The more the merrier. The more diversity in the views, even better. I would like to hear from contenders how they would vote differently on some of the votes the incumbents have cast. Because all too often we have "an independent minded Republican" or a "progressive reformer" or "Heck, I am BATMAN himself" only to have disappointing regurgitation of ideology of what should not be done ("low taxes", "freedom", "family values", "apple pie, motherhood"). Not what will be done. And until we have that, corporate monies shall determine our representative. I mean I can imagine Mr. Raths voting for the 45th time to repeal Obamacare, but seriously, which vote that John Campbell cast would be different if Mr. Raths were in office? If 90% of the positions are the same, it looks like a remarkable coincidence that an independent thinker is so like the incumbent, does it not? Mr. Raths did offer an 'independent' idea endorsing civil unions but not gay marriage. Cool. Is he going to sponsor a bill for civil unions? Or simply insist on enforcing DOMA because "sanctity of marriage", "religious liberty". How about H.R. 1797? How about the Gang of 8 bill on immigration if it passes the Senate and comes to the House? Will his vote be different than that of Mr. Campbell's? That is the key question. But again, I welcome Mr. Raths entry in the field, we need more variety, and if we cannot get that, we at least need more people willing to run. Good luck to you, sir.
Human Options' Cristi Dugger
Peter Schelden (Editor) June 19, 2013 at 09:29 am
Uncanny timing—this is especially poignant in light of this announcement:Read More http://alisoviejo.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/elder-sexual-abuse-caregiver-suspect-arrested
M June 19, 2013 at 07:32 am
Anymore info on this place? When I looked online the only location is vista, ca
Dan Avery June 16, 2013 at 10:09 am
Tom Thumb you didn't read section 1021(b)(2) closely enough. It wouldn't apply to those arming theRead More rebels because of the word "suspicion." We know they are arming the rebels. See the difference. 1021(b)(2) only applies to those we "suspect" like you. Notice how the word "reasonable" doesn't appear anywhere near "suspicion"? Hmmmm wonder why that would be. Section 1021(b)(2) seems to be the modern day "suspicion of lurking with intent."
Tom Thumb June 16, 2013 at 02:31 pm
Shoot, I don't know about that. What we are hearing now is Obama/McCain are pushing to arm theRead More rebels who are supporting and are part of Al Qaeda: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22095099
Shripathi Kamath June 16, 2013 at 03:02 pm
Hey Avery, I am totally stealing the "suspicion of lurking with intent" phrase. It mightRead More even flourish on reddit.